Forum

To keep away from leading different folks astray, https://vrpornsex.net/ please don't confer with movies using the host identify youtube.com or its aliases. Instead, make a hyperlink to invidio.us or one of many associated proxy websites. Lead people to what is good, not to what's dangerous! Just be sure that not to choose a proxy that is "protected" by Cloudflare, since that sends its own nonfree software program. This way of referring is probably fail-safe: it might stop to work, but it can in all probability not begin leading folks to run nonfree software. There can also be a Firefox add-on to bypass that Javascript code. IceCat comes with that add-on by default. But that will not overcome the blockage of entry via Tor. If Google defeats the invidio.us proxies, I can ell you how I will not reply. I cannot surrender to youtube's nonfree software and surveillance. I enjoy getting access to the music and video there, however I cannot do foolish or desperate issues to keep that entry. You should not both! You do not want a special "platform" to submit an audio or video on the internet. You possibly can post an audio or video file on any net site. Just put the file on the positioning and link to it as if it have been an peculiar web page. All graphical browsers can handle that.Google censored installation of Samsung's ad-blocker, saying that blocking advertisements is "interference" with the sites that advertise (and surveil customers by way of adverts). The advert-blocker is proprietary software program, identical to this system (Google Play) that Google used to deny access to put in it. I might refuse to have either of them on my computer. Using a nonfree program offers the owner energy over you, and Google has exercised that energy.

Surveillance

To determine yourself to a Google service is a grave error. - Google stores an inventory of all purchases a person has made that in any manner mention the consumer's a gmail account. A consumer can delete purchases from this checklist, but just one purchase at a time. Then that buy disappears from the checklist that the user sees. Whether it remains in one other listing, we have no idea, but I'd anticipate Google to answer that question with doubletalk. The article talks about what Google cites as its motive for doing this, however the motive is irrelevant - because it's not an excuse.- Google's alarm system, "Nest Secure", turns out to have contained a microphone all along - but solely just lately began listening.- Google "sanitizes" its total search logs, then publishes them; nevertheless it declines to describe the means of "sanitization", and there is evidence that users will be tracked by them.

The article also mentions two-factor authentication, which in and of itself may very well be a useful technique (although I've learn that crackers can now defeat it), however has the flaw of requiring a mobile phone. My rule #2 for digital security is to not have a mobile phone.

- Gmail was deliberate from the start as an enormous surveillance system, to make psychological profiles not only of Gmail customers but of everybody who sends mail to Gmail customers.- Google quietly combined its ad-monitoring profiles with its searching profiles.- Google has found a means to trace most credit card purchases in the US, even these not carried out by a cellphone, and correlate that with people's on-line actions.

Google cannot do either side to me, since I pay cash and do not carry a mobile phone, and it would not know what web pages I have a look at.

- Google Play sends app developers the private particulars of users that set up the app. Merely asking customers' "consent" for this is not enough to legitimize that. We all know that the majority users have given up on studying simply what they're "consenting" to, and the reason being that they are accustomed to being instructed, "If you'd like to use this service, it's essential to consent to blah blah blah." To truly protect people's privateness, we should stop Google (and other corporations) from getting this personal information in the primary place!- Google shops an enormous quantity of knowledge on each person. This can include, along with the consumer's search historical past and promoting profile: - A timeline of the user's location throughout every day- Data on the utilization of non-Google cellphone apps- 'Deleted' emails and information uploaded to Google Drive

Facebook and Google joined with ISPs to defeat a privateness initiative in California. Collecting the many ways Google is concerned with US authorities surveillance, abroad and within the US, quantities to quite a bundle.

Google invitations individuals to let Google monitor their cellphone use, and all internet use in their houses, for an extravagant cost of $20.

This malicious performance will not be a secondary aspect of a program with some other function; that is the software program's sole goal, and Google says so. But Google says it in a way that encourages most people to disregard the small print and remain unaware of the extent of the spying. Anyway, mere consent doesn't legitimize massive surveillance.

Amazon and Google want "sensible" devices to report all activity to them.

In other words, when you've got a "sensible" (read "spy") lightbulb with that proposed feature, and tell an Amazon or Google listening machine about it, thenceforth any time you switched it on or off no matter how, it might ship a report to Amazon or Google.

Even in the present day, the one approach to make "smart" merchandise secure is to ensure they can't connect to anyone else's techniques.

Another piece of Google's surveillance capitalism: when stores mail receipts to a gmail.com account, Google figures out and data who bought what.

I believe that the store itself mustn't get this information, which is why I at all times pay cash and by no means give my name.

*Google faces lawsuit over tracking in apps even when users opted out.*

- Google cuts off accounts for users that resell Pixel phones. They lose entry to all of their mail and documents saved in Google servers below that account. It should be unlawful to place any "phrases of service" on a bodily product. It should even be illegal to close an account on a service with out letting the person obtain whatever was stored there. These events present another purpose why schools should by no means ask a pupil to use a service account linked to the scholar's identify.

Censorship

- Amazon and Google have lower off area-fronting, a characteristic used to allow individuals in tyrannical international locations to succeed in communication techniques that are banned there.- French blogger Claims YouTube Tried to Censor Juncker Interview.- Google has agreed to carry out particular censorship of Youtube for the federal government of Pakistan, deleting views that the state opposes. This can assist the illiberal Pakistani state suppress dissent.

- Youtube's "content ID" automatically deletes posted movies in a method copyright law does not require.- YouTube has made personal offers with the copyright industry to censor works that are honest use. More information.

- Google shut off Alexa O'Brien's Google Drive account, denying her access to it, as a result of her reporting on Chelsea Manning's trial included copies of al-Qa'ida propaganda that was offered as proof.- Google is deleting porn artists' porn videos from their very own personal accounts, quietly and mysteriously.

Never trust a remote storage company to keep anything but a spare backup copy. If you store that, put your files into an archive and encrypt it in order that the corporate cannot inform what's in them - not even their file names.

- Vox legal professionals received Youtube to take down criticisms of a video revealed by Vox, and threaten the critics with punishment, too.

The videos had been nearly absolutely honest use, but Youtube decided towards the critics anyway. This shows how Youtube's general submission to the copyright industry constrict's folks's rights.

Miscellaneous

- Google is a tax dodger. After all, it's not the just one, but that is no excuse.- Google helps the TPP due to three largely-evil provisions that would benefit Google.- Google has made it in order that Chrome now robotically installs the DRM module. This makes it harmful for security researchers in the US to investigate doable insecurity in Chrome. More data.- Support is growing for reverting US antitrust regulation to what it was before Reagan weakened it. That's the reason Google is using its affect to weaken those that campaign in opposition to this.

How I Got Fired From a D.C. Think Tank for Fighting Against the ability of Google.

- Google informed a reporter in 2011 that web pages with out "+1" buttons would be punished with lower search rankings. When she published a story in Forbes about that, Google pressured Forbes to take it down.